Evaluation criteria for the art of the times there must be a consensus, the key is not in a leadership or institutions have developed a set of criteria, but the attitude in practice, methods and approaches is correct. Present in a number of exhibitions on the arts, there are a few vulgar works of art this phenomenon is not surprising. Since reform and opening up because of relaxed social environment, artistic diversity, will naturally arise in the complexity of the situation varies. Judge for the arts, it is important to enlighten the conscience, to promote good moral values in our country. High art in our long history of such a country where the standard has always been there. These standards exist in the history of art theory, the text on the inside. Since ancient times, our ancient literature on the painting materials, character, frame, personality, level, style, and many, many techniques and artistic creation high on the ease of exposition, has been established for the arts, especially the evaluation the standards of traditional Chinese painting. And, in this way also to the dialectical tradition of innovative thinking, that is, good, bad, old and new all aspects of the standard, so it is not our own lack of "standards".

With standards, we need to be strengthened, but a fair and impartial attitude and approach. To be out of the public mind, anyone can be worked out before the table, a decent standard. Now some of the activities of the selection criteria appear in confusion, loss of credibility and I think the problem in a number of managers themselves, or judge, in an extremely small number of those who have ulterior motives, the "speculation" where real power faction. Like the judges, the media and event planners, famous artists, renowned critic, art dealers, etc. They are all real power faction, a small number of the speculation here basically have taken place. There is speculation that a small number of people in a number of activities in the exhibition or played a bad role, which constitute the majority of grass-roots social workers for a number of art events, exhibitions and even dissatisfied with the conflict arising from these activities further their own authority, credibility, etc. aspects of a growing tendency to weaken with the phenomenon.

As for the artists in terms of, first of all should cherish liberal reform and opening-up brought about by free environment. We should ask ourselves whether they can really create the world to remain conducive to the good works of mankind. First of all, do not speculation, a good artist, often talented, smart-minded people. Changed his mind after so long as, for example, what the public wants judges to vote, or vote in a leadership opt for money or for what the public wants, rather than according to their own sense of art to create, it will deviate from their own conscience and artistic sensitivity. Artist and judge of the relationship if it is speculation, it will form a vicious circle. Therefore, the Government should select judges the cause of the development of the arts, this is very important, artists have self-discipline. Media will be less speculation, especially those who do not promote speculation famous "star." Because of speculation the star, he famous, rich, powerful, media or in such artists before the judge, should have their own main position, which is very desired. Dare media supervision, is a social progress. Media since the reform and opening-up and supervision is the development of our society the results of a major reform and opening up to the media environment for the development of good, the media should be to achieve self-worth, their own voice, played a supervisory role.

I would like to use a small example to illustrate the problem. I am still a child at the age of 34, because to do one thing that came to me what to do, I said to him: You do not read "Grandpa brains" of the book you, you look at this you do things right? If not, you should go for a search to see how to do. He went inside the room, and after a while he ran, this should be on how to do things. Adults should not tell him one way or another, through their use of their brains, he would make a correct diagnosis. Now he is more than 30 years old, together talking about this matter, he said: "At that time I desperately want the room, how can you believe that I say is right." A result, he found himself on doing things the right direction and method. I feel that through this example, not to mention adults, is the ability to distinguish between children is also very strong. To be fair and impartial manner to give him the right to establish their own, guided and non-interference, so that he judged based on their own ideas, so often can have good results.

Therefore, on the artistic criteria, if the judge, not for individual artists, the public heart, but from our own small thinking, or starting their own painting style, then the art will certainly be biased judge. Creation occurs when deviations occur when the judge bias, propaganda and bias can occur when. Fundamental issue is for the public to see whether positive or negative heart. Because the judge always has a certain artistic level and a wealth of experience, and for them it is not difficult to judge the quality of works of art. Mainly due to a small number of people lack of moral self-discipline arts.

As some experts that "the arts build a standard", and the construction of "cultural image of great power", I feel great power to shape cultural image rather than to build up can be done. Start from the basis, from the restoration of human dignity, to the artists to create a relatively relaxed environment, from the establishment of an objective and impartial evaluation mechanism to proceed. In the show "big country cultural image" on the question of the role of art is a slow impact on the process of the realization of a natural process, after a period of guidance, which will naturally straighten out the relationship.

2009-5-7